• unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    absolutely. the debate when we were kids, and some, many in the city wanted light rail, which was ultimately voted down. my buddy who lived out in the sticks argued, it wouldn’t benefit him way out there. I should have pointed out he already benefits from the sewer and water infrastructure extended to far out communities like his. should have asked him to justify why the city supports him living out there.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Rural houses around me are all on well/cistern water and septic systems. I’m not even clear how you’d run sewer way out without elevation gain towards the rural areas, isn’t it largely dependent on gravity?

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They could be using lift stations if they run the sewer out that far. If the city annexed a chunk of rural land and was planning on expanding into it over the next few years they may have preemptively investing in sewers and water to help spur development.