Still too much money to be giving CD project red
Explain?
After the launch of cyberpunk I lost all respect for them and pirate from them now. They don’t deserve a dime.
I understand that fixed it… If you also buy the DLC.
I still think it’s unreasonable to let it slide
Il not sure you understood my question? Maybe you can explain why you think o e mishap is deserving of shunning?
It’s simple. It has really become common in the gaming industry to release a broken game then “fix” it later.
Cyberpunk was worse than no man’s sky at launch. Hello games is a small team of people with deadlines set from Sony and a natural disaster going through their office plus multiple legal battles going. CD projekt red had no excuse. They’re a AAA studio that also published themselves. So there’s no excuse to release the game how they did.
I disagree with the new norm of launching a broken game. I think it shouldn’t be common. If marvel released a movie and half the film had no CGI or editing then I wouldn’t watch or pay for that movie not many people would.
So CD projekt red doesn’t deserve any money because it will just encourage them to release another broken mess then “fix” it later with a paid DLC.
Everyone is saying get the trilogy bundle, but the dlc bundle is what’s important
Buy it on GOG.
I Like gog but is there any reason why to prefer the gog Version over the Steam one?
To give the developers the whole price of the game instead of 1/3 to Steam. And to really own the game (the installers executables). GOG has sales of the Witcher games all the time.
- It’s DRM-free.
- It’s (one of?) the only platforms that cares about preserving old games.
If you prefer the Steam launcher (I do), you can always buy with GOG and launch with Steam.
PSA: Steam version is also DRM-free.
There’s a bundle that includes the first two games as well for like an extra buck I think. Buy them and then never play them and feel bad about it.
The first game is rough by modern standards. Most people (even the most diehard fans) will tell you to just skip it. The second is worth playing, but with the mindset of “this game was made in the 2000’s”. Because it is definitely showing its age too.
For the third one, just know that the intro is a slog. Get to the Bloody Baron before you write it off, because that’s when the game actually starts to get interesting.
First one was rough by the standards of when it came out in the first place. It’s rooooouuuuggghh.
For those of us who have never played any of them, is it suggested you go through 1 and 2 first? Is there a recommended play order? Or just “Jump into 3 and forget about it”?
Skip 1, play 2. The second game opens with the main character having amnesia, so basically everything important from the first game is explained to you. The first game is rough by modern standards, and will almost certainly put you off of playing the rest of the series.
2 is starting to show its age, for what it’s worth. It’s still a great game, but go into it with tempered expectations; It’s missing a lot of the quality of life things you have probably come to expect. Though you can also mod the game, so that may be worth looking into if you enjoy modding.
3 is a great game, but get through the intro area before you actually judge it. The tutorial is a massive slog. The game picks up around the time you reach the Bloody Baron, so at least get to that point before you write it off as boring. The DLC is 100% worth playing. Play the Hearts of Stone DLC before finishing the main story, then the Blood and Wine story after beating the game. And again, there are a few mods that I would install, like an auto-loot mod. The “apply oils when you draw your sword” mod used to be necessary too, but the devs actually ended up adding that into the base game.
I would actually recommend to also skip the 2nd one. They made some, ahm, unusual decisions, like having to meditate to drink potions meaning alchemy is basically useless unless you know when a fight is coming, which would be alright but the game also has a tendency to throw you into random fights right after a cutscene.
Witcher 1 was weird, but I finished it just a few years ago. The combat is half automatic. Like, if you get a dodge skill it just means that when an enemy attacks, “Dodge” might appear above your head more often as enemies attack you. You dont actually dodge anything.
Geralt just swings his sword like crazy (automatically) and numbers appear above the enemies to indicate damage. It’s a constant stream of numbers. And you press buttons once in a while to cast spells, change combat style, or do special moves. At least I think you manually trigger special moves. It’s been a while.
If you watch this video on YouTube, you’ll see what I mean. None of the sword slashes involve pressing a button. They just happen.
I thought it was worth playing. Janky, yes, but worth playing. I played 1 and 2 before playing 3.
Don’t worry if you didn’t get that discount this time. They have this exact one all the time. At least on GOG.
I wish Cyberpunk went under -60% off. I don’t tend to buy stuff over -80-90% sale, so more patience for me… 😅
On GOG too! DRM-free ;)
Complete edition is 10€, same on Steam
Sweet another addition to my 15+ year old account I only made because of the first humble bundle. I really tried putting effort into one and two, but they never gripped me. Hopefully I can find time to invest in this guy.
The trilogy is only $7.49 btw.
The third one is a significantly better game in pretty much all aspects.
The intro act is a bit of a grind, but once you make it to the main story, it’s really good.
35 years old and this is one of the most overrated franchises I’ve ever touched.
Go away, Todd.
