db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up188arrow-down158cross-posted to: politicalmemes
arrow-up130arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 days agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes
minus-squarenaevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·2 days agoEh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agoI find this sentence very funny
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 days agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 day agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-21 day agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 day ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
it’s a fact, not dogma
I find this sentence very funny
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up