db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 个月前PSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down166
arrow-up131arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 个月前message-square28linkfedilink
minus-squarenaevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·3 个月前Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·3 个月前Accelerationism is a religion.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·3 个月前Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·3 个月前 Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-23 个月前stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·3 个月前I find this sentence very funny
Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
I find this sentence very funny