db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down165cross-posted to: politicalmemes
arrow-up132arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 month agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 month agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 month ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-21 month agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism