• Nangijala@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve heard a few people try and demonize Signal even before this goofy situation by claiming terrorists use it to plan attacks and I’m just sat over here like: yeah? Terrorists have also used youtube, Facebook, Twitter, discord and every other platform under the sun to organize and recruit to their groups.

    And now there’s this blunder (?) And somehow Signal is bad for the decisions other people make on the app? Which btw, I don’t believe for a second that that was an accident. You will have to actually make an effort to add someone to a chat who doesn’t belong there.

    And I’m sorry, but I think the comment is pretty funny. I dunno. Maybe I’m just completely morally bankrupt or missing the bigger picture, but every negative thing I have heard people say about Signal is just bizarre. I genuinely don’t understand what the issue is.

    Need I remind anyone of how ISIS used Facebook and messenger in 2018 to post brutal execution videos of two scandinavian girls around Christmas and sending that shit to everyone on the girls’ friends lists? As much as I hate Facebook I wouldn’t dream of blaming them for some subhuman scum abusing their service for nefarious reasons.

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I heard about a WoW clan leader in like 2005 or so who got interviewed by the FBI because some of his guild members used it to organize an attack. I think they threw grenades at an Army base or something.

  • Undearius@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The comments of that tweet are nothing but “Signal is full of huge design flaws”

    Right, because “add user to group” is a design flaw.

    • ceenote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If it’s full of design flaws, they probably shouldn’t be using it for military planning. It’s sad to see the cult members grasping at straws to make this the fault of anyone but those incompetent buffoons.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure, there are plenty of great reasons to use Signal… like if you want your private messages you’ve sent linked back to you via a phone number. No tool intended for maximum security is going to require you to provide a phone number, which is incredibly difficult to acquire in the US without some form of KYC metadata. But sure if you’ve never read Moxie’s blog to see he is obviously invested in Israel’s agenda, then go ahead.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Tox is the most secure messager I know of. Next is Briar. I consider Signal to be on the same level as Telegram.

      • zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        telegram has no usable form of e2ee (and what it does have is opt in only) so no, it is not on the same level as telegram. it is, in fact, ahead of it