• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    More likely they know that Musk has a well-documented habit of frivolous litigation and spreading lies about anyone that gets under his skin. They’ve decided it’s not worth the fight

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      The Royal Society resides in London, so Musk can’t make frivolous charges like in USA.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        The cave diver Vernon Unsworth lived in Thailand, so Musk just tried to spread the rumour that he was a paedophile instead. And unfortunately Musk now has a bigger following and platform than ever

        To be clear I don’t necessarily agree with the Society’s decision. I just think there is a pretty obvious possible motive without the Society having skeletons in the closet, regardless of whether it actually does or not

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I never took it as an accusation, more of an insult. I honestly don’t remember if he doubled down or not, but I do seem to recall he backed off after threats to sue. Dangerous insult to use. - if you call someone an asshole, it’s pretty clear it’s hyperbole. Pedophile, not so much.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            He doubled down enough to hire a PI to investigate Unsworth and to tell Buzzfeed that they were “defending a child rapist” when they approached him for a comment, which is doubling down enough for me. He did claim it was all jokes and insults when Unsworth (unsuccessfully) tried to sue him for defamation