• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What do families do, that only want or need to live in a place or area for like a year or so? Buy a house, pay thousands in closing costs and inspections, lose several thousand to realtors, and then have to go through the trouble of trying to sell the place a year later?

    We very much need landlords. What’s screwing everything up is corpos doing it as a business or individuals with like 20 homes instead of one or two. Renting a house is a viable need for some people and it would actually suck if it was an option that didn’t exist at all.

    • Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s no reason that local governments can’t do this job, there’s no need for middle men leaching money.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Based on the way they maintain infrastructure, I’m not certain that’s going to work out well either, but then again the status quo ain’t working either.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason costs of houses are so high in the first place is because they are lucrative investment objects, along with the fact that the most important part of city (and rural) planning, building homes, is largely left to private companies. You are assuming houses would be just as inaffordable without landlords, which is a problem of the current paradigm and not the one proposed.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A couple of years ago, my boss’ father (who founded the company and still worked there on and off) and I had a chat over lunch. I’m not sure how the topic of house prices came up, but he mentioned that when he and his wife bought their house, a car cost more than a house, so you knew that someone was really well off if they had two cars in the driveway.

        I think that’s the first time I’ve actually gotten my mind blown. The idea that a car could cost more than a house just didn’t compute, and it still doesn’t quite sit with me.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Of course, the general standard of houses decline the further back in time you go, but houses were a lot cheaper back in the days. Below is a figure of housing prices in Norway relative to wages at the time (mirroring the situation almost everywhere in the west):

          Factoring in the increased production capabilities over the same period of time, the construction cost of houses are not that much higher. If we designed our communities better and had a better system for utilizing the increased labour power, we could have much more affordable housing and more beautiful and well functioning societies.

          Do not let it sit right with you. This future was stolen from you.

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a landlord and also have a full time job. I also spend my time fixing my units.

    With the maintenance cost and taxes, I’m actually losing money or breaking even depending on the year.

    My tenants are living in a house that they wouldn’t be able to afford on their own in today’s market. Being able to live near their work.

    So why am I the bad guy?