• sidebro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    20 days ago

    This excuses piracy.

    And whenever I want to pay for a game, I will do it through GOG.

  • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    19 days ago

    Then their ‘Buy’ and ‘Purchase’ buttons are false advertising. ‘Rent’ is the word they’re looking for.

  • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 days ago

    If the button said “Buy” or “Purchase”, ownership of that item is transferred (obviously not the IP itself). After you buy it, the supreme court has weighed in that you can make your own backups of “media” previously so Sony can fuck right off.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      SCOTUS has endorsed the terms and conditions they make you sign and allowed them to do things like making you waive your right to sue and instead use binding arbitration of their choosing, and making you agree to not actually own this as such.

      What you say was true 26 years ago or more, it’s not now. We are well on to our way of owning nothing and renting everything we own in truth even if not in law.

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        True, but while I have access to something I back it up by nature. They can probably take it off of something they can access but those devices don’t have access to my whole network so I’m gonna stick with my original thought, Sony can fuck right off.

        (Really good points though)

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    20 days ago

    Then, I purchase no games, which I cannot own anyway. Good riddance. I stopped gaming pretty much all the time.

  • Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    If labeling buttons “buy” is illegal when it’s not buying to own but subscriptions, “pre-order” should be illegal too. “Ordering a license” doesn’t make much sense between expectation and differentiation to (owning) products.

    If buttons are labeled “Rent” and “Schedule Rent”, do you think it would have an impact? Significant impact?

  • SpaceCrystal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 days ago

    This is why PC gaming is more superior to home gaming consoles that are riddled with DRM. At least you own digital copies of games that you buy on there.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Only true on DRM free marketplaces. Nearly only GOG. Not Steam - you are very much at the mercy of their TOS, it’s just a better TOS. But we shouldn’t rely on merciful kings.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    I bought the first Queen album on vinyl. Then 8-track. Then cassette. Then compact disc. I finally pirated the digital version. I owned every piece of media that the album came on with the exception of the pirated copy (which I could have digitized from my compact disc). In not one case has a company ever came into my home and said “You have to give that back, but no refund though”. This makes no sense.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    Do players even own PlayStation consoles? Sony arbitrarily restrict what operating system run on hardware people buy from them.