We’ve had some trouble recently with posts from aggregator links like Google Amp, MSN, and Yahoo.

We’re now requiring links go to the OG source, and not a conduit.

In an example like this, it can give the wrong attribution to the MBFC bot, and can give a more or less reliable rating than the original source, but it also makes it harder to run down duplicates.

So anything not linked to the original source, but is stuck on Google Amp, MSN, Yahoo, etc. will be removed.

      • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        And yet the mod log is empty of that. If was spamming there’d be more than 1 in the last week.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I said they were profligate in their posting, not spamming. Say, for instance, users with 1.6k posts in around 60 days. Personally I feel they have been spamming, but the mods think differently and that’s fine. However they are pretty universally regarded as posting and commenting to an unhealthy degree.

          • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Lemmy is a small, but growing community that needs more content to compete with Reddit. Prolific posters are actually something to celebrate for helping the community grow. In my personal opinion.

            I actually wish there were more prolific posters and more posters in general.

            And of course, we can always block posters if we don’t want to view their content. :)

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              It doesn’t need your posts, as evident by the massive amounts of downvotes your propaganda receives. No one is celebrating you.

                • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Ah, right, I left that off of my script notes! It’s one of your classics. I’ll be sure to keep that one in mind moving forward.

                  I, for one, am happy to see people treating your posted content the way they do: like spam and propaganda. If you keep it up, you’ll reach your next major milestone of 50,000 downvotes. Truly something to aspire to.

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Wow, speak of the devil! Lemmy growing for the sake of growing just recreates Reddit. Every forum is dominated by a super minority of posters, a small minority of commenters, and a super majority of lurkers. Nothing has changed about that since the Usenet days you claim to be old enough to remember.

              Posts without thought or of low quality encourage people to go elsewhere. The answer is not more crap posted by more people, it’s quality posts from diverse users with healthy and good faith discussions. So basically the opposite of what you do with the volume and choice of articles you share, and your rampant attempts to stifle and distract from constructive discussions in the comments.

              Poorly sourced and written articles presenting issues without context are not only actively harmful to this community but harmful to the prospect of Lemmy and the fediverse as a whole. The fact that this is something you don’t recognize surprises me not at all.

                • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I mean, how could we tell if you’ve ever even read them as you refuse to discuss them or even talk about why you thought they were interesting enough to share?

                  Also, considering your frequent errors and comment editing and what you chose to share, I don’t believe we share equivalent standards on writing or journalistic quality.

                  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    14
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Good thing I don’t write the articles then, right? Can you imagine how error-prone they’d be?! lol

                    And hey, at least now you know I’m not a bot. Thank you! :)