• microfiche [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m not exactly one who keeps up to date with new file extension information, so I have no idea but what makes them vastly superior? Compression? Data use? Visual quality?

    Is it a case of the xkcd joke about creating a new standard? Is this just a case of wanting to use new and hot when old and busted works just fine?

    • FloridaBoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      JPEG-XL is superior to jpeg in every way. It has a cool feature where it can do a partial decompression where it will initially load an image a low res and progressively load the remaining data.

      I think webp became the newer de facto standard because of Chrome’s (Google) browser dominance.

    • ashinadash [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      All of the above. See jpegxl.info, but they’ll output vastly superior image quality at the same size as old jpeg or way smaller files at the same quality. They also feature cool progressive loading for internet purposes. JPEG is from 1992.

      I have no fuckin idea why adoption of these is so poor. AVIF is from 2018 and JXL is from 2021, so it’s galling to still be staring down vanilla jpegs and fuckin webp’s…