• Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      77
      ·
      edit-2
      4 天前

      Cope and seethe. Classic line I’ve seen for literally every instance of historically implemented large scale communism.

        • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          39
          ·
          edit-2
          4 天前

          Almost like its an impossible to achieve strictly idealistic and illogical pursuit. Interesting how thousands of individual communes are able to exist and thrive within capitalist states though.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 天前

            Which is it? There can’t be a “classic line” for historically implemented large scale communism if large scale communism is impossible to implement. You’re contradicting yourself.

            • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              4 天前

              Every time something is labeled communism it’s communism until atrocities happen. Then it wasn’t really implemented. Both of my statements are true. Pigs can fly if you throw them off a cliff. But pigs never had wings so they could never really fly. That’s because the initial statement is based on an impossibility centered around arbitrary vocabulary. Both statements are true.

              • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                3 天前

                Nah, that’s nonsense word salad. Either large scale communism is impossible and thus has never been implemented, in which case the “classic line” is 100% true, or it is possible in which case your claim that it’s impossible is wrong.

                Either way you seem to have a pretty weak grasp of history and logic, so good luck out there 👍

      • DoubleDongle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 天前

        The problem is that proper communism is functionally impossible, and every crackpot despot in the last hundred years has wanted to get a little street credit with the working class by slapping socialism or communism on their brand.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 小时前

          Proper communism is functionally impossible at the present day. It is possible that after generations of widespread automation and gradual socialism, people on average may come to be able to exist communistically.

          You are correct though that historical examples have typically just been slapping an ideological label on a system that was neither socialist nor communist in practice. I mean, communism doesn’t even make semantic sense below the global level.

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 天前

          Proper communism has been done at a small scale many times, e.g. in Catalonia during the Spanish civil war. Its main point of failure has been insufficient ability to defeat violence from without.