• drkt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 days ago

    It says (updated) but what is the update?

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      153
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Update (one day later):

      YouTube has just reinstated the video, after what I presume is a human review process. I wish it didn’t take making noise on socials to get past the ‘AI deny’ process :(

      Go forth, and self-host all the things! I’ll post further updates in this issue in my YouTube project.

      • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Go forth, and self-host all the things!

        He means self-hosting as in hosting his own PeerTube instance? Right??? 🙏

          • Meldrik@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, he says he’s dependent on the ad revenue. However, no one is asking for him to drop YouTube. Also posting on PeerTube will simply have him reach more viewers. It won’t move viewers away from YouTube.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              People don’t pay. They say they would but they don’t. So we are stuck with YouTube and ads. I know people complaint about them but what is the alternative. People have to eat.

              And yes I block ads I don’t care but I understand why they are needed. And for some reason most don’t block them.

    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      2 days ago

      YouTube restored the video, but not until Jeff had made a huge stink about it (and rightfully so, those yt fuckers can eat a dick).

      • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, and it was a one off restore, so others who are mentioning self hosting will still be taken down as long as that policy remains.

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I agree.

          I will add, however, that Jeff’s main concern isn’t the policy itself, but that he and other youtubers can’t see it or know what the rules are. The lack of transparency is the real issue.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I hate youtube so much. When are they moving all to freetube peertube or something? How long do we all accept Google youtube?

        • non_burglar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re the 800lb gorilla, and no other platform can create “youtuber” income, so it’s a real problem for people like Jeff Geerling to move from yt, even if they know it’s bad, because it’s a major part or all of their income.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          When are they moving all to freetube or something?

          Unless I’m missing something Freetube is a client. So it wouldn’t be Jeff moving to freetube it would be you using freetube to watch his content on YT.

          I’m guessing you meant peertube instead of freetube and your answer there is “When they can get paid.” Making content takes time and costs money and YT pays creators like Jeff for doing it.

          I dislike YT alot but there’s financial decisions at play here that can’t really be argued with.

          • ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s not one or the other though. Peertube with patreon can exist alongside YouTube

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Patreon is just one source of income. Ad revenue is another. Its good to have more than one source if you wanna make a living with it.

                • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  16 hours ago

                  I guess I missed your point lol. Is it possible to paywall a peertube video behind Patreon?

                  • ada@piefed.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    It’s possible to post unlisted videos that are only visible to folk with the URL.

                    Its good for folk who want to give their subscribers early access

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              I went over and looked at the peertube FAQ and nope, there’s no monetization plan. Their reasoning for that is consistent with their goals but it is a hurdle to creators moving to the platform.

    • django@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Update (one day later):

      YouTube has just reinstated the video, after what I presume is a human review process. I wish it didn’t take making noise on socials to get past the ‘AI deny’ process :(