you should be able to do that from the web interface, and it will apply to any apps because your server does the filtering.

fyi, some are already blocking lemmy.ml too. I’m not yet sure if I want to go that far, but I’m getting tired of their china apologism. and this community is also on ml, soo…

But you are not forced to buy anything upon seeing a sticker.

of course, but this is like the cashier saying: nah we won’t accept your purchase, the security guard will escort you out of the shop

thy were talking about microsoft office. that provides neither of those

yeah I often feel similarly. like, the KDE Akonadi calendar-contacts-whatnot system is so so buggy

8 GB RAM or more. OS installed either to SSD, or a HDD that does not store service data (for performance). a modern CPU with at least 4 cores. modern means it has at least AES and AVX2 instruction sets to do math quickly, but probably you can just pick one made in the last 10 years, with less years generally meaning better energy efficiency.

what kind of services do you want to host on it? initial plans, perhaps longer term plans?

I’m just not going to enable disable it.

36 pixel in height is not much

yeah, in chrome. It’s put behind a permission… but that’s just a single click or two, and very dangerous, like webusb

maybe the plugin system wasn’t that bad of a concept for video players and such, but it should be more limited and especially secured in any way possible

can we add webusb and direct filesystem access to the list?

that seems like a plasma bug made visible by a distro quirk

ok, got it. this applies to KDE Plasma.

right click on a program’s icon in the start menu, like kate.
click “edit application”.
switch to the “application” tab.
change what’s in the “name” field.
click “ok”.

I think this should be doing the same thing

I wish I could just easily reconfigure the name and icon of the default apps so it’s fixable at least.

you can have overrides for .desktop files, and the name is stored there

oh, is that human also related to paypal? I know it as a (former) big facebook investor

Because it’s just that simple!

some of us are not going to youtube to watch something, anything, as a distraction, but to watch a very specific thing. yes, even after google tried to kill that sentiment several ways including botching the subscription system

Let me put it this way, I think if Google decided to offer Youtube to either of us for a dollar on the condition we can’t resell it to anybody and we have to keep running it forever we’d both still take it.

I’m not sure about that. what would I do? manipulate elections? manipulate public opinion? I’m not an advertising company to be able to do that

laughs in invidious. google doesn’t even get to know I’m watching anything

searx, because it queries multiple engines that are accessible, and perhaps google frontends (whoogle, libre y, and that new mullvad thing).

but for the past years I was exclusively using duckduckgo and it would be very said if it would go away :( I started recommending it to others too

well, they have an app store, an account systwm and their own push notification provider, so it could happen

If Samsung does it, it would be great for the deGoogle movement, and would open the floodgates for others.

I’m not sure about that. samsung is not that respectful of ownership righs, in my eyes at least