Well, your own sources say the opposite, so you are contradicting yourself, or perhaps you didn’t actually read your own sources, but instead sent whatever you thought supported your biases.
Methodologically rigorous research finds 2-8%
In contrast, when more methodologically rigorous research has been conducted, estimates for the
percentage of false reports begin to converge around 2-8%.
• For example, in a multi-site study of 8 U.S. communities involved in the “Making
a Difference” (or “MAD”) Project, data were collected by law enforcement
agencies for all sexual assault reports received in an 18-24 month period. Of the
2,059 cases that were included in the study, 140 (7%) were classified as false.
This is particularly noteworthy because a number of measures were taken to
protect the reliability and validity of the research. First, all participating law
enforcement agencies were provided training and technical assistance in an
ongoing way to ensure that they were applying consistent definitions for a false
report. In addition, a random sample of cases was checked for data entry errors.
Well, your own sources say the opposite, so you are contradicting yourself, or perhaps you didn’t actually read your own sources, but instead sent whatever you thought supported your biases.