• maam@feddit.ukOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    241
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Mullvad co-founder Daniel Berntason donated 452k euros to the fascist Örebro Party in Sweden which made up 72% of the party’s total funding in 2025. This political party wants to deport non-white citizens and immigrants guised under the white nationalist euphemism “remigration”

        • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          3 days ago

          You know that’s the least credible source and literally, as biased as you can get. A self proclaimed “Socialist newspaper”.

          How did we go from “don’t believe everything you see on the Internet” to “i’m gonna believe this is true because it says so on this website!”?

          • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            3 days ago

            Eh, a cursory glance at their proposed policies is more than enough to convince me they’re fascist. Ethnic purity, ending welfare, rejecting non-classical art, rejecting international alliances, and for some reason making all kids eat red meat daily.

            All of those things are either directly fascist or closely associated with modern fascist culture wars.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              That’s entirely possible. I don’t agree with everything he says, and I’ve since learned from reliable sources of various disgusting comments made by him in person. But I’m still not going to use “Flamman” as a reliable source. They are not a reliable publication. And they are not taken seriously in Sweden.

              It would be a bit like taking what “FOX News” says about US Democrats as a reliable source of unbiased information.

              • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Fox News May be known for their opinion segments, but their journalism team is actually competent, and their polling teams are some of the best around.

                • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  You’re arguing with a troll, he’s not out after facts, just to push his fascist views by trying to muddy the waters.

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I’m sure they are. But you would look for other sources to confirm or deny. Because you know they are known to be biased.

                  “Flamman” however is closer to Alex Jones Info Wars than FOX News. Minus the peddeling of protein shakes or whatever it was

                  • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    Yeah that’s what I did. I looked up the OP policies, and rapidly identified them as almost certainly fascist. Which was the original question. Not the source credibility.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              3 days ago

              He confirmed it. Mullvad has literally nothing to do with it. It’s a private donation.

              The point is. You’re listening to hardline socialists pointing at a party they disagree with screaming “facism!” And go like “oh… well, if they say so it must be the case”

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Remigration is ethnic cleansing, basically going further than what Trump and ICE is doing in the USA right now. You don’t need to know more about them.

            The other side of this is that Sweden is now 8.1% Muslim. It’s inevitable that people get fed up with this. No matter if it’s right or wrong, people hate it. Especially when the economic outlook is grim.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              That is a very strong statement. What’s your source of them wanting to achieve an ethnic cleansing with forced deportation of Swedish citizens? Taking steps that go beyond Trumps ICE.

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yikes. I followed the sources listed and yeah, the dude is legit unhinged. Not only for what he wants, but that he also thinks it’ll be possible.

                  Things he suggest and wants require changes to the constitution. And changes to the constitution takes more than 4 years as it has to span over the next election cycle and be voted on (again) by the following elected government.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I trust socialists way more than I trust capitalists. Socialists want to liberate the world, capitalists want to enslave it.

            • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 days ago

              You do you. But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology. That has to be the dumbest shit I’ve heard today.

              • Avicenna@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                But I wouldn’t trust anyone on the sole basis that they claim they subscribe to a specific ideology.

                Almost as dumb as rejecting someone based on their ideology alone? Or do you have any resources to prove their journalism is biased apart from that “they are socialists”. You have been out here for days shitting on this news paper “Flamman” that you yourself have admitted to hearing for the first time

                Nor have I ever heard of this publication “Flamman”, that also claims to be some old socialist newspaper.

                You have not presented a single source as to why they are biased apart from them being “socialists”. You have also been going around trying to shit on other resources as much as you can, blaming people of not providing enough resources and saying things like “misinformation is how propaganda spreads”. These are all applications of the “accusation in the mirror”.

                • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.

                  The fact they are a political publication means by definition that they’re biased.

                  If they weren’t, they’d be politically neutral.

                  It’s sad, that this has to be explained to you.

                  I did indeed hear about them for the first time recently, and the more i learned about them. The worse it got. They’re not considered reliable

                  • Avicenna@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Sure. Have i rejected something on the sole basis of someones ideology? No.

                    Yes you have rejected the credibility of a publisher you have encountered for the first time solely based on their ideology.

                    the more i learned about them

                    Provide resources about what you have learned about them.