• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If your priority is defeating Zionism, fascism, and the flouting of the rule of law, at least going to the ballot box to vote for the candidate who normalizes them slightly less seems like it might kind of be helpful to that end.

      If you’ll notice, that wasn’t a compelling enough argument for the genocidal garbage centrists preferred to beat the genocidal garbage they were willing lose to as long as no one got the chance to vote against genocide.

      Do better or lose. Pretty sure I know which course of action you prefer.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m saying that even if you aren’t you made the most baffling, illogical choice possible given the information at your disposal, that it turned out predictably,

          I voted for harris.

          Anyone who criticizes the genocide is automatically lumped into nonvoter territory by people who support absolutely nothing else.

          and that the only thing that has shown any signs of doing so at all in the past 18 years is that a smart, capable man who is willing to work with them instead of against them got elected mayor of New York and started actually changing the minds of voters to get them more engaged, not less.

          And the genocide wing fought him harder than they have ever fought any republican. The “vote blue no matter who” wing predictably turned back into “party unity my ass” when someone to their left overcame their fuckery and won the primary. They’re trying the same shit with Platner, DAC, and Talarico.

          If you run as the second worst genocide-happy turd again, you’ll lose again. Not enough democrats will vote for centrists’ only policy.