• FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      It depends entirely on how long people are willing to lend to the Russian government. People will continue to lend as long as they think there is a reasonable chance of making a return. Also “lending” can in some sense mean “working for free”.

      A government doesn’t need money; it only needs to remain the government. To do that, it needs to prevent an uprising that overthrows it. To do that, it needs the people to be happy and/or fearful enough to not rise up. Happiness requires adequate supply of the essentials of life. Fear requires a force of loyalists equipped to suppress the rest of the population, which requires those loyalists to be adequately supplied.

      Supplies require people working to produce those supplies - be it farmers harvesting food, actors making TV programs, or people operating machinery to refine oil.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Also “lending” can in some sense mean “working for free”.

        I don’t think it’s an expectation of future return that has them doing that, rather an expectation that doing so well lead to intangible yet real protection.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Impossible to say. I remember i read some article in 2021 that russia cannot keep up the fight for more than 6 weeks or their economy would fall apart, yet here we are.