• 5 Posts
  • 3.78K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 16th, 2025

help-circle
  • Yes! They used a reed with a wedge profile and pressed it into soft clay at different angles to make the different marks. There are many different cuneiform writing systems - cuneus is Latin for “wedge”.

    I think it’s fair to say it was quite impractical compared to modern writing, and you can see how it got vastly simpler over time - some symbols had dozens of individual marks, but were eventually obsoleted or simplified to have only a handful. The thing is, society was not literate then, so it was only the scribe profession that needed to use it.

    And when you get into the akkadian system where one symbol could have a phonetic meaning (like a letter) or more than one, or also a logographic meaning (one symbol=one word), it is quite chaotic.










  • I haven’t been able to observe all two year olds. It’s only a few percent of the population that has arachnophobia, and the fact that it doesn’t always present in infancy doesn’t mean it’s learned.

    Though it’s quite possible there’s a combination of predisposition and learning.









  • FishFace@piefed.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Couldn't agree more
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Well, I am more convinced about trans identity due to what I understand to be a strong medical consensus on gender dysphoria. As far as I understand there isn’t a similar consensus on dysphoria or something akin to it for people who identify as non-binary. So, I could be convinced of that to the same standard - or a higher standard, of course, because as you point out, I can’t be certain of anything. At one point I was in a similar position on trans people, but after a while learnt more.

    We just have to be convinced that our reality isn’t the only one.

    I think even this doesn’t quite capture it, for me! Because suppose I were convinced, actually, that non-binary people were just “making it up”, whatever that meant. Well, so what? It doesn’t affect much, really. It might lead me to hold some positions on practical things - maybe I would be pretty strongly opposed to medical or surgical intervention for nonbinary people, if that were what I thought. But it doesn’t mean I hate them, or want them to suffer, or die, or feel ashamed for what they have, in my opinion in this scenario, “made up.” You can think someone is wrong - even about their own mind and body - but disagree with them respectfully. Yes, it may make for uncomfortable conversations, or even strong disagreements over treatments, but that’s still a far cry from hatred, for which there is no need and little excuse*

    So even though I think it doesn’t capture it, we end up agreeing in the conclusion, I think!

    *Indoctrination is some partial excuse, but not total by any means.


  • I feel a bit similar with nonbinariness. Not uncomfortable but maybe unconvinced. But fucking hell, it’s not something worth hating anyone over. And like most things that I’m unconvinced by, it won’t prevent me from treating anyone politely. You’ve got to be a certain kind of fucked to let it get to you to that level, or worse, to whip up that kind of sentiment in others