Less of a deep dive into the phenomenon of fake Tumblr stories and more a Mariana Trench excursion. Visit http://curiositystream.com/sarahz and get thousand...
You literally said “we need to copy this” as a reply to “nazis are good at manipulating people through fear of ridicule”. That’s the entire point you were making. How charitable do i have to be when you explicitly say “we need to learn to argue just like an abusive internet nazi making up a bunch of fake ass bs to own the SJWs”? Of course that makes me uncomfortable, it’s kind of a valid concern that you will not just use that to get back at the fascists, and the way you immediately jump down my throat at the tiniest pushback and make up a bunch of accusations against me proves my point fairly well. I’m just gonna block your hostile cranky ass, this isn’t going anywhere.
So you hyberfixated on a throwaway word on a throwaway comment and thought that was enough to accuse me of wanting to copy the right verbatim and become a “abusive manipulator” and now your mad cause I pushed back on that bullshit accusation?
against the right
Wtf did you think I meant when I typed those words? You seriously thought I was saying “we should create sock puppets and accuse the right-wing of being cringe liberal feminists” you genuinely think that’s my train of thought?
This is why charitably is so important, least of all because it prevents you from picking unwarranted fights
and the way you immediately jump down my throat at the tiniest pushback and make up a bunch of accusations against me proves my point fairly well
"Oh no how could anybody take an uncharitable interpretation of a one sentence post that literally says “we need to copy how nazis manipulate people that’s so mean and scoldy”
Yeah, that’s ALL I said, “we need to copy how nazis manipulate people” I even used the word nazi and everything apparently
I certainly didn’t structure and contextualize my argument with the words “wield it against the right” which blows your dipshit, inquisitorial, bad faith interpretation out the water
Got any more lies of omission or ways to flatten a tactical discussion about turning an opponent’s effective communication and psychological framework against themselves into a supposed endorsement of Nazi tactics or ideology?
My cereal is fine, but with respect the mere suggestion that fascists get back a little of what they dish out seems to have soured yours, how strange
I hope nobody interprets that in a uncharitble and obnoxious way and implies things about your character
You literally said “we need to copy this” as a reply to “nazis are good at manipulating people through fear of ridicule”. That’s the entire point you were making. How charitable do i have to be when you explicitly say “we need to learn to argue just like an abusive internet nazi making up a bunch of fake ass bs to own the SJWs”? Of course that makes me uncomfortable, it’s kind of a valid concern that you will not just use that to get back at the fascists, and the way you immediately jump down my throat at the tiniest pushback and make up a bunch of accusations against me proves my point fairly well. I’m just gonna block your hostile cranky ass, this isn’t going anywhere.
So you hyberfixated on a throwaway word on a throwaway comment and thought that was enough to accuse me of wanting to copy the right verbatim and become a “abusive manipulator” and now your mad cause I pushed back on that bullshit accusation?
Wtf did you think I meant when I typed those words? You seriously thought I was saying “we should create sock puppets and accuse the right-wing of being cringe liberal feminists” you genuinely think that’s my train of thought?
This is why charitably is so important, least of all because it prevents you from picking unwarranted fights
"Oh no how could anybody take an uncharitable interpretation of a one sentence post that literally says “we need to copy how nazis manipulate people that’s so mean and scoldy”
Yeah, that’s ALL I said, “we need to copy how nazis manipulate people” I even used the word nazi and everything apparently
I certainly didn’t structure and contextualize my argument with the words “wield it against the right” which blows your dipshit, inquisitorial, bad faith interpretation out the water
Got any more lies of omission or ways to flatten a tactical discussion about turning an opponent’s effective communication and psychological framework against themselves into a supposed endorsement of Nazi tactics or ideology?