$1050 for 512gb no controller

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What they should have done is made a new Steam Link with more capable hardware for cheap. That would have sold like hotcakes.

    The Steam Link was pretty much a dumb terminal for VNC. In what way does it need to have “more capable hardware?”

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Steam Link did not have H265 supported in streaming settings IIRC.

      The Steam Link was capped to 1080p at 60 FPS.

      Those are some serious hardware limitations.

      They could have easily refreshed it at the time.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not sure anybody really cares about the streaming codec as long as it works with good quality.

        But fair enough: I agree it would be nice to have a “Steam Link 2” that could do 4K60 (or better) and (as pointed out in a Machine review video I just watched) support HDMI CEC.

        (Maybe some third-party company should do it and name it the “Missing Link,” LOL)

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The streaming codec matters because it (265) is incredibly better and more efficient, which is what you want for streaming.