You must log in or # to comment.
[disputed - discuss]
Surprisingly most wikipedians are siding with ‘Iranian victory’ as correct, as that’s what most of the approved sources are calling it
It’s not actually as surprising as you think. The liberal thought process on any political discussion starts and ends with “does this hurt* Trump?”
* performatively insult Trump’s ego in a way that doesn’t actually affect anything
what are you talking about. How could you not see this as iran winning? They got de facto control of one of the most important shipping lanes for oil and computer chips AND (potentially) 300 billion USD to rebuild.
they lost lives and infrastructure, true. but they discovered a weakness in the American military we haven’t seen since vietnam and exploited the fuck out of it.
But most liberals aren’t thinking about that. We’re talking about the editing of some words on Wikipedia, not the actual event. Liberals love gotchas and they don’t think about the actual actions. That was the point of my comment.
discovered a weakness in the American military since Vietnam
I’m on your side but let’s not get overboard lol, we ate shit hard in Iraq and Afghanistan
i ate no shit at all in this century
I ate a little bit of shit once
i dispute that it ended two days ago
Should be the name of documentary about the citations needed podcast
Citations Needed castimatic universe with a spinoff for each type of wiki tag
[desperate pls help]
you know what? im sorry you’re a lib for posting this. this kind of celebration is equivalent to getting high from the garbage bin juice behind a kebab shop
getting high from the garbage bin juice behind a kebab shop
Those are the roots of hexbear tbh
hands off my bin juice
I agree with you, but comparing the opposite position to a raccoon would make me more likely to agree with it instead.
Another win for nation states vs the people :(
