I can never get used to how easily they go mask-off.

      • danciestlobster@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        This is a really cool link. There is something I don’t understand in the example though. The first scenario assumes that when you play a richer opponent and win, you get 20% of your total money before that flip (less than you started with, 960). But then later when playing as a person who won the first flip, if you play against someone who lost the first flip and lose, you would lose 20% of your money and the winner gains 20% of YOUR money, not 20% of their money, leading to them having 1040 and you having 960. So something is screwy here unless I missed something.

        Agree with the premise overall. Maybe the example needs workshopping though? I can’t quite tell what happens when people with highly disparate amounts of money play each other as far as who gets what I’m the outcome.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.ioOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          But then later when playing as a person who won the first flip, if you play against someone who lost the first flip and lose, you would lose 20% of your money and the winner gains 20% of YOUR money, not their starting amount.

          The wager is 20% of the poorer player’s money.

        • alapakala@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          That’s just an example. The point is that in a yard sale economy, ❝democratic❞ capitalism, [directly] empowersleads to national ❝socialism❞ (Fascism).

          Both Goldholz’s Mathematics & History teachers forgot to drill it their heads.