• sakuraba@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    man what a waste of bits for this comment, yeah I guess, next time we will put a law to end world hunger?

    but go off, it’s not like we have an issue where healthcare quality is declining in Mexico while the government is spending money on projects like Tren Maya, AIFA or more fossil fuels…

    I’m amazed by you people, you will complain (rightfully) that trump has wasted a lot of money on his shitty war and his shitty ballroom while their people are suffering but when a self proclaimed ‘leftist’ gov does the same shit you will believe whatever they say at face value and ignore what the actual citizens have to say about it

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Genuine question, is the article posted painting the wrong picture as well? Its conclusions for example:

      It’s unlikely to fully deliver on its universal promise by 2028 unless funding, staffing, and state-level coordination improve sharply. But even so, the most likely outcome is meaningful improvement in access and coordination, especially in emergencies and underserved areas. It likely won’t be a seamless or fully equal national health service in the near term, but if things go according to plan, there will be improvement.

      Still, without sustained increases in public health spending, universal access could become a bottleneck rather than a breakthrough. Mexico also has to improve its labor retention, and lastly, ensure digital execution.

      If it works though, it could be a remarkable achievement. It’s a pivot away from the US-style employment-tethered chaos and toward a unified, digital-first “National Health Service” like in Canada, the UK, or Europe (but with more biometric tech).

      To me it seems like it raises concerns similar to the ones I’ve seen here, but still has a kind-of-hopeful outlook. Am I missing something?

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well now you’re moving the goalposts. At first you were just complaining that this step in the right direction is useless.

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        you can’t see how it is useless? I’m telling you it is useless because there is no real access to quality healthcare and giving you examples on how dismissive you all are about this issue just because on paper we are moving to the right direction

        cool I guess I moved the goalpost by giving you more context on my country

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seems like a step in the right direction to better serve the people, as opposed to trumping being many steps in the wrong direction for personal enrichment to the detriment of the people.

      I can see how you could confuse them …. NOT

      • sakuraba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        You see how some americans still support trump because the only media they consume will feed them lies about how he wants the country to prosper but he keeps getting sabotaged or something?

        Well it’s the same shit here, while our government will say all this, they are getting richer with illegal oil bypassing out taxes and giving huge contracts to their family and friends

        (oh yeah and we are not even touching the topic of all the foreign projects approved by our gov that will destroy a lot of our natural reservations)

        I can see how you are ignorant of our current situation in México