• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    5 days ago

    Money wins again.

    It’s not a big enough issue for the pols to come down on the side of the people. They know they won’t be voted out on this one decision, so they came down on the side of the money.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 days ago

      On the bright side, there’s not enough money in live service anymore, so plenty of companies are getting cold feet when it comes to making games that can be killed anyway. Yeah, that’s a reach for a silver lining, but it’s something. I’d like to believe that the action they say they’re taking will result in real change, but it sure doesn’t sound like it.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        there’s not enough money in live service anymore, so plenty of companies are getting cold feet when it comes to making games that can be killed anyway

        Got a source to back that up? I’d love for it to be true, but all I’ve ever heard is the opposite…

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sega

          Hasbro

          And I thought there was a third example in recent weeks, but I’m struggling to find it right now. In place of that, you can look at the implosion of Sony’s live service efforts, with Marathon falling far short of making money, and for some reason Fairgames, rumored to now be called Break-In, will be the last one out the door after that Horizon live service. After that, I’d be shocked if they keep trying.