• stopdropandprole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I know it’s a hot take and not that serious, but I can’t help but read this as making excuses/validating inaction.

    it smuggles in the implication that bothering to advocate for those 3 things (taxes, regulations, workers benefits) is a waste of time under broken capitalism. as in “why tinker with regulations if the system is inherently unjust?”

    when in reality, arriving at a new economic system will almost certainly be a gradual process of normalizing pro-social policies and tax structures and regulations from within the current socioeconomic context we actually live in.

    sure, Total Economic System Change is an admirable goal… but I’d be pleased to see even a smidge more taxes (on 1%), more regulation, more workers getting what they deserve in the meantime.

    • davad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because it contradicts the narrative many people have that the homeless are “lazy” or “just need to get a job.”

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It a rhetorical stratwgy pulls on heartstrings more and highlights the falsity of wealth = good person. People who are supposed to be held up by society as the moral upstanding ones making life threatening sacrifices in the name of the defense of the nation should be rewarded for doing so. Not that that understanding of it is the reality of it but there are enough normies that believe it becauae Republicans that preach it and then do the opposite.

        • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Personally I generally don’t hate or blame the people that go into the meatgrinder that is the military as enlisted soldiers. I hate the systems that drive people to desperation where the idea of potentially being required to take someone else’s life to gain some modicum of survival, to go from a system of unbearable poverty to a system of violence as identity and to be a pawn for the wealthy to sacrifice for natural resources under the guise of national defense and patriotism and then disposed of once you’re no longer useful.

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Hate the “veterans” modifier because no one should have no home but mercenaries for empire are far from special and in fact the least deserving.

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It is. It’s the way we work for ourselves rather than for each other that’s the issue.