• Liz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Noise separation is pretty easy to design into a building. Air separation is possible but would require design that no one bothers with, as far as I know.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Noise separation is pretty easy to design into a building.

      I wonder why more don’t do it then.

      I would be very interested (and I assume I’m not the only one) in a condo + association which advertises strong noise controls. HOA’s always seem to concentrate on the wrong things IMO.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s slightly more expensive, and most developers are trying to build the cheapest thing they can sell. A good number of places have put in noise separation into their building code though, so depending on where you live any new place will be dead quiet.

        In a wood-frame building, for example, you increase the thickness of the unit-to-unit walls by a few inches and leave a small air-gap between two layers of insulation. The hard-soft-air-soft-hard boundary makes for a very difficult path for sound to travel through. You have to purpose-build the walls if you want maximum noise isolation, because the studs have to be staggered so they don’t bridge the gap and transmit the sound through your defenses.