To sum up my response to the other person further down the thread directly to you as well:
I don’t think the difference is that significant.
I’d more consider this a rhetorical sleight of hand to lead away from the term and its perception as “evil bad scary socialism” (particularly in the US). Describing the benefits as a good thing (particularly in the context of profit-oriented mentalities, where “good accounting” would be desirable) dodges the propaganda directed at a specific label.
To sum up my response to the other person further down the thread directly to you as well:
I don’t think the difference is that significant.
I’d more consider this a rhetorical sleight of hand to lead away from the term and its perception as “evil bad scary socialism” (particularly in the US). Describing the benefits as a good thing (particularly in the context of profit-oriented mentalities, where “good accounting” would be desirable) dodges the propaganda directed at a specific label.