• starik@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Free markets are a lot more efficient than trying to run the whole economy from the top down. We just need to tax accumulated wealth.

    • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Capitalism and free markets are not the same thing, nor is either particularly necessary to the other.

      • starik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The comment I was replying to seemed to assume capitalism had something to do with resource allocation.

        • FatCrab@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean, capitalism does have to do with resource allocation, or rather allocative power. It’s defining feature is that allocative power is used in service to grow the allocative power of those whose allocative power was used to allocate resources in the enterprise under consideration. This doesn’t require a free market whatsoever, and that’s why things like state capitalism exist. The other corollary to this is that it inevitably tends towards constricted markets as allocative power naturally consolidates among fewer and fewer holders as time goes on.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      All these tankies down voting you as if the entire world wasn’t running on this principle and as if something better existed. Free markets with oversight are simply unbeatable - fact.