ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 个月前Streisand's rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1224arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1221arrow-down1imageStreisand's rulelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 个月前message-square16linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLwL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down3·2 个月前So true we should ban everything that someone finds slightly creepy, even if it hurts absolutely no one and is clearly a fairly common thing. We should especially put it on the same level as doing things that irreparably ruin lives!
minus-squareCobraCommander@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·2 个月前Some people are really telling on themselves with how hard they’re defending “jailbait”.
minus-squareHacksaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 个月前Fighting the dilution of the word pedophile apparently is the same as defending pedophiles… This is definitely a pedo psi-op…
So true we should ban everything that someone finds slightly creepy, even if it hurts absolutely no one and is clearly a fairly common thing. We should especially put it on the same level as doing things that irreparably ruin lives!
Some people are really telling on themselves with how hard they’re defending “jailbait”.
Fighting the dilution of the word pedophile apparently is the same as defending pedophiles… This is definitely a pedo psi-op…