• Kacarott@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    So I grew up around creationists. When I presented this idea, the only attempt at a justification I heard was something like “in the original Hebrew the word for a literal day was used, that’s how we know creation happened in literal 6 days”

    Which baffled me enough to shut me up, so that guy probably thinks he convinced me.

    • RiceMunk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well duh, if they meant metaphorical day, they should have used the hebrew word for metaphorical days.

      /s

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which baffled me enough to shut me up, so that guy probably thinks he convinced me.

      This seems to happen to me more frequently these days. Sometimes a person will say something so absurd that it just stops me in my tracks and I’m sure they think it means they “won”

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dont know hebrew, but that does seem plasuable enough to me. My understanding is that different languages have different structures, and therefore its definitely plausible that hebrew has a “literal” structure. Similar to how we say literally, except we use it wrong a bunch.

      Of course, I generally doubt anyone that says they know hebrew until they demonstrate it, so i doubt what they said was true, but I could understand how it might’ve been believable.