• mrmaplebar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    What?

    Layoffs are never about productivity. If AI was making workers more productive (it is not, in fact) you would simply enjoy the increase output of your existing workforce or maybe even hire more people for even more potential growth.

    No no. This is about money. They are laying people off because they are trying to make the balance sheet look better next quarter.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      you would simply enjoy the increase output of your existing workforce or maybe even hire more people for even more potential growth.

      This assumes there’s the aggregate demand needed to absorb your increased product output. If there are no more sales or higher prices, it means workers would be sitting doing nothing for longer due to the increased productivity. The moment that becomes apparent, the exec layer would cut the workforce so that fewer people produce the needed output for 40+ hours a week.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Its surpriaing to you that a talented person is more productive than a drone, regardless of whether ai is used or not? Which plane of existence do you live on?

      I know people who code dedicated CAD systems from scratch without ai, and people who struggle to code password hash verifiers with chatGPT on the desktop. The former did it in a month, while the latter was at it for a week, refusing help the whole time.