Hello, maybe it’s out of scope of this community, but it’s an haunting question i can’t answer and i hope someone could do it for me: what’s the logic behind the reasoning of Jenner about the trans cause? It seems that she zigzags permanently in this subject. She in turn:
-a misaimed transactivist
-a boomrang bigot
-disinteresed of transactivism
-asking seemingly deliberately to leopards to eat her face
-whining when it happens but still loyal to the said leopards
-advocating for the said leopards going vegan
I don’t get the logic behind her reasoning since it’s not remotely consistent (outside her endorsement to the GOP), it’s worse than people who are stubborn about their opinions, who are at least coherent with themselves.
Right…
He is on one extreme.
And as I said, it’s not binary.
Some people, dress fulltime, but still have the same motivations as Noem’s husband.
It’s weird…
I wrote all that about how we should look at people individually, and you definitely read it, but still responded saying the “real solution” is making a shit ton of boxes to put them in along a single axis.
Completely and totally missing the larger point that there’s innumerable different axis.
The logical result of your idea, ends in mine where everyone is a unique person.
You’re just not thinking all the way thru.
Even two people on exactly the same spot on this axis, have so many different things, that getting them in the same “box” on this a is is pointless.
All boxes are pointless when talking about an individual.
You’re thinking of nouns and not adjectives, and that’s reductive even if coming from a good place.
Edit:
To clarify, Noem’s husband was an example of someone who (infrequently and in private) portrays themselves as a gender other than what they were assigned at birth.
It is a very long axis, and on the other end are people who get full surgery and live entire lives as a different gender.
Along the axis are occasional cross dressers, drag queens, people that just change underwear, and just literally too many different points to list.
Because if you keep looking closer, no two humans are ever exactly the same on any single axis.
Making two boxes is dumb.
Making 3 boxes is dumb, or 4 or 27, or however many different boxes, it will never be enough until every one has their own box, which is where we’d end up treating everyone as individuals on an individual level.
Conflating a cross-dressing kink and trans people is not talking about a variety of spectrums, it’s just innacurate
One is sexually motivated, the other isn’t. It’s a clear line.
I agree that people are too complex to be put into boxes, but we can talk about issues without overlapping them with completely separate ideas because of surface level similarities like wearing clothing designed for a different sex than your biological one.
The spectrum of people with humiliation or cross dressing kicks and trans people are two circles that might overlap like a Venn diagram, but they’re fundamentally different and acting like they aren’t is reducing trans people to sexually motivated fetishists. Its just not accurate
Again, to be perfectly clear: someone with a bimbofication kink is not on the same ‘axis’ as a trans person, and I find the suggestion that they are to be problematic at best and bigoted at worst
Edit:
This is it really. This is not an accurate or realistic portrayal of trans people. It’s a fun house mirror of trans identities pushed by bigots