[Op-ed by Irwin Cotler, international chair of the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights; and Mehmet Tohti is the executive director of the Uyghur Rights Advocacy Project.]
China’s new visa-free policy for Canadians may appear to signal openness. In reality, it exposes Canadians to risks our government has found difficult to mitigate.
Consider Huseyin Celil, a Canadian citizen illegally detained in China for two decades.
Mr. Celil, a peaceful advocate for the rights of the Uyghur people, travelled to Uzbekistan in 2006, where he was detained and forcibly transferred to China. There, he was convicted on baseless “terrorism” charges in a sham trial condemned by Canada.
China has continued to refuse to recognize Mr. Celil’s Canadian citizenship, thereby denying him the basic protections owed to him under international law, including consular access. His family in Canada has been without meaningful communication or reliable information about his condition for almost two decades. Their uncertainty is continuing; their suffering is immeasurable.
His case is an enduring injustice and test of Canada’s capacity to protect its citizens abroad.
…
It exposes a contradiction: How can a state that denies a Canadian citizen his rights simultaneously claim to welcome Canadians?
…
For those engaged in human rights advocacy, political activity, or public criticism of the Chinese Communist Party, this [visa-free visits to China] creates a major vulnerability at the border. They may face increased risks of refusal of entry, disappearance or imprisonment.
For many Canadians in these diaspora communities, the question is no longer “Can I travel?” but “Will I be safe if I do – and will my country help me if I am not?” This risk is not confined to diaspora communities. If Canadian citizenship can be ignored in Mr. Celil’s case, it can be ignored in others’.
When a foreign state can detain a Canadian with impunity and deny their Canadian citizenship, the protection that citizenship is meant to guarantee erodes for everyone.
…
The new visa-free policy intersects with a broader pattern of surveillance, intimidation and foreign interference. The Foreign Interference Commission concluded that **China “stands out as the most persistent and sophisticated foreign interference threat to Canada.” **Beijing targets democratic institutions, politicians, and the diaspora through intelligence services to advance its interests and manipulate Canadian politics. The PRC views Canada as a high-priority target, not only for foreign interference, but transnational repression, in violation of Canadian sovereignty and security.
…
Twenty years after Mr. Celil’s abduction, we call on the government of Canada to raise his case and to:
- Engage in high-level diplomatic representations to seek proof of life.
- As the home country, provide the necessary diplomatic and consular assistance and remedy. We likewise call on China, as the host country, to honour its obligations for that purpose.
- Restore family contact, including at least one phone call with his wife and children in Canada with all deliberate speed.
- Renew efforts to secure his release and reunite him with his family here.
These are not extraordinary demands. They are the minimum obligations owed to any Canadian citizen.
…
As usual criticism of misinformation is framed as defence of China. Now with added projection about using alts to spread narratives. Anyone in doubt can view my post history and contrast it to the post history of this set of accounts. Unlike them, I don’t post about China every day, but when I do, it’s often to reply to some false narrative from them. Which apparently makes me the sockpuppet. Brilliant stuff as usual. 🥹
@avidamoeba@lemmy.ca
Nothing what I said is misinformation. The sources I cited - as well as many others - provide undeniable proof that traveling to China comes with a high risk. Canada also officially warns to “exercise a high degree of caution” in its travel advisory. Your accusation of misinformation is wrong.
And your account has exactly the same spin as many others here as you well know. You are frequently spreading false narratives that are pro-China, anti-democratic (and often anti-Canadian), often paired with absurdly weird insults against OPs with a different opinion.
These accounts are sock puppets or part of an orchestrated disinformation campaign. This is not organic.
To anyone reading this thread, I implore you to read my posting history and then compare it to the posting history of these accounts, Scotty being one of them. The difference should be revealing.
The difference is very revealing. I am not a tankie.
Whoever the fuck you are propagandizing for it’s much worse than being a tanky.
Neither am I. Now go on with your day, you have an hour left before dinner time, you can make a few more posts about China imprisoning its own citizens, who may hold another citizenship they do not recognize.