Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agoHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldimagemessage-square374linkfedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down1147
arrow-up1913arrow-down1imageHee Hee Ho Ho Ha Halemmy.worldChippys_mittens@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 17 days agomessage-square374linkfedilink
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·16 days agoSo it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop? Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
minus-square|IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·16 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarenull@piefed.nullspace.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·edit-216 days agoAgain, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog. Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”
deleted by creator
So it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop?
Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?
deleted by creator
Again, neither of their credentials (or hackery) have anything to do with whether or not Hasan shocked his dog.
Like I said, your focus on this is deflection. Or since you want to use debate terms “appeal to authority fallacy”