Sure, I can help you with that. I already had some very annoying, firsthand, real life experience:

• “What, you’re gonna believe Trump now?” (repeated several times)
• “What you’re gonna believe Mossad and Netanyahu now?”
• “Since when does the CIA fund leftists?” (they’ve long funded compatible leftists)
• “I know an Iranian socialist who said the protests were genuine.”
• “We really need better sources before judging.”
• “That [using the timing of the protests to connect them to regime change efforts] is just bullshit.”
• “There were genuine grievances long before, so the [armed] protests [at that special time, scale and level of escalation] must be a genuine expression of popular will [and should therefore be tailed by socialists]” (additions in brackets mine, even if the protests were genuine, blindly following them would be tailism)
• “No, I’ve never heard about Lenins concept of national liberation.” (National liberation from imperialism sometimes has to come before communist revolution)
• “That’s condescending of you to explain it to me”
• Upon mentioning the simultaneous and much larger pro Iran counter protests: literally handwaves, makes angry noises
• Upon mentioning how both the victims (Iran) and the perpetrators (US and Israel) are in agreement about the unrest being fabricated, and how strange it is for a westerner to claim to know better and assume a conspiracy to lie about fabricating unrest and arming protesters, when it has been their declared strategy for years: angrily leaves the room