
The only thing I remember from that book is de Tocqueville says the only Americans who seem to care about national politics are either very rich or complete cranks. And he says the very rich ones have very petty, minor disagreements with one another because rich people live in little secluded mansions completely separated from normal society so their political concerns don’t seem to match what’s actually happening in the world. And despite all that, their disagreements are really bitter and aggressive. This book was written in 1835.
I think I remember something else where he talks about how politicians in America are less likely to do direct corruption, like clear cut bribery, and more likely to leverage their political power to gain connections and wealth, then when they transition to private life they retain those connections to both wealthy people and government power. Something like that? I read this book 20 years ago. Also he was very clear that America is lying about the freedom and liberty stuff because of slavery and the genocide of indigenous Americans.
I haven’t read the book. From how you describe it, it seems like he was not wrong.
Hmm, it does sound relevant to my interests. I do like it when people point out rich people are assholes.
Btw has anyone actually read it? Is it worth reading? Tbh, the Amazon description doesn’t sound very appealing. Kinda
little white supremacy even.Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-59) came to America in 1831 to see what a great republic was like. What struck him most was the country’s equality of conditions, its democracy. The book he wrote on his return to France, Democracy in America, is both the best ever written on democracy and the best ever written on America. It remains the most often quoted book about the United States, not only because it has something to interest and please everyone, but also because it has something to teach everyone.
It’s not a whitewashing that the description makes it out to be. Tocequville is working for the July Monarchy and so he was interested in how liberal democracy in America
suffered fromcompared to the aristocratic structure of post-Napoleonic France. He admires the individualism of the frontier settlers while also pointing out that the US constitution has no actual mechanisms to enforce said liberal democracy when faced with an executive that doesn’t respect the separation of powers.It’s also an attempt to ward off any Jacobinism, he started writing it shortly after the June 1832 “Le Miserables” revolt. (One of the first times the Red Socialist flag was raised.)
Gotcha. That might be interesting. Thanks
I’ve read it but I mean everything he wrote is just kinda known to you already if you have even a passing interest in 19th century American history. It’s interesting seeing a foreign perspective but also I don’t know if you’re missing much. Like hey did you know Americans have a bunch of newspapers and also have a ton of competing churches and also rich people have a bunch of slaves and also native Americans are excluded from society.
It is probably an easy read. In college we read some passages from it and thr passage I remember was him talking about how Americans are anxious all tbe time and work too much.
honestly my only familiarity is from excerpts in Liberalism: A counter-history by losurdo and it didn’t seem too appealing but it may kind of be an interesting historical perspective on the USA far before its hegemony
I read it years ago and remember exactly 0% of it






