TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agodesign rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square54linkfedilinkarrow-up1236arrow-down110
arrow-up1226arrow-down1imagedesign rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square54linkfedilink
minus-squarePatrikvo@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoWhat’s worse is the implication that Jar-jar was good character design.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·18 days agoI think he was but I was the target audience
minus-squareQueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoHe was, just not for the movie he was in. I mean Minions can be funny, but you’d never put one in Lord of the Rings.
minus-squareTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoLord Jar-Jar is iconic!
What’s worse is the implication that Jar-jar was good character design.
I think he was but I was the target audience
He was, just not for the movie he was in.
I mean Minions can be funny, but you’d never put one in Lord of the Rings.
Lord Jar-Jar is iconic!