Today’s development is that I’m committing theft from content creators on YouTube.

OK. So, you think I, as an unemployed writer, am responsible for “content creators”? What the fuck does that mean, anyway? I’ve shot porn, written lots of columns and editorials, and taken photos.

This is back when we didn’t call it “content.” So what’s your point? Up-and-comers need more money than corporate America and me?

I’m going to need a more compelling argument than “you’re stealing if you use an adblocker.” I simply don’t have the energy to point out that if losing work as an editor makes me a thief, you should direct your ire to the media companies that no longer care to hire us.

If I were making six figures and owned my home, as I should at 46, sure … fair play. I can afford YouTube Premium. Neither is true, so this feels mostly like a case of “shut up, nationally award-winning pleb who has literally run newspapers; you don’t understand the media industry.”

And in a manner of speaking, they’re right. I understood it only while we had the audacity to commit journalism.

  • perry@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    This comes up over and over again. In my opinion it doesn’t even come down to your standing etc - I’m streaming data over HTTP, for the most part, and only I get to choose how that’s rendered. It just so happens that my renderer discards outbound requests to certain domains and drops some HTML/JS components that look bloated and or unnecessary.

    Piracy? Theft? What a joke. My attention and complacency was never a component they should have relied on in the first place. This is a technical issue for me, not a moral one.

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, on a metered connection, such as mobile data, I consider it theft for advertisers to steal my allotment. That’s not how I want to spend my data.