Gsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Justice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comexternal-linkmessage-square239linkfedilinkarrow-up11.25Karrow-down111cross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1external-linkJustice Department considering push for historic break up of Google after landmark antitrust ruling: reportnypost.comGsus4@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square239linkfedilinkcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.ee
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Neither you nor almost anyone who upvoted you or replied to you read the article, huh
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 年前FTA: “DOJ attorneys could ask Judge Amit Mehta to order Google to sell portions of its business” That’s the author of the article speculating, they don’t know what it would actually look like any more than you or I do. Bonus, as I noted, it doesn’t address the primary issue of a search monopoly. Even if they sell off those business unit, the search monopoly remains.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 年前There was more discussion of potential remedies in the article than that.
Neither you nor almost anyone who upvoted you or replied to you read the article, huh
FTA:
“DOJ attorneys could ask Judge Amit Mehta to order Google to sell portions of its business”
That’s the author of the article speculating, they don’t know what it would actually look like any more than you or I do.
Bonus, as I noted, it doesn’t address the primary issue of a search monopoly. Even if they sell off those business unit, the search monopoly remains.
There was more discussion of potential remedies in the article than that.