compostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoBorispiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1854arrow-down113
arrow-up1841arrow-down1imageBorispiefed.cdn.blahaj.zonecompostgoblin@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square103linkfedilink
minus-squareModern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?
minus-squareModern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI’m not debating that a person would lose. Just pondering where the line between losing and winning might fall. Any thoughts on that?
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoThere’s a lot of reasonableness and average person would expect in law, but needing a supersonic bullet to hit it is well out of reasonable territory.
deleted by creator
I just wonder where the line is. Is it intent to harm. So if say the thing was a gift, and they didn’t know it was explosive. Would that absolve the person of guilt. Maybe it goes to manslaughter in that case?
deleted by creator
I’m not debating that a person would lose. Just pondering where the line between losing and winning might fall. Any thoughts on that?
There’s a lot of reasonableness and average person would expect in law, but needing a supersonic bullet to hit it is well out of reasonable territory.