AltMediaGuy@altmedia.housecakeM to AltMedia@altmedia.house · 3 months agoPeople are noticing the word "don't" is censored in the Epstein files, and that this may be automated censoring of "Don T"altmedia.houseimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1357arrow-down13
arrow-up1354arrow-down1imagePeople are noticing the word "don't" is censored in the Epstein files, and that this may be automated censoring of "Don T"altmedia.houseAltMediaGuy@altmedia.housecakeM to AltMedia@altmedia.house · 3 months agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squarehemko@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up65arrow-down2·3 months agoSounds plausible but if you search for dont - 12k results don t - 2k results don’t - 70k results But there’s other very strange redactions as well, like “I” here It’s probably some shitty AI work
minus-squareAltMediaGuy@altmedia.housecakeOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up35·3 months agoI’d ONLY - I “DON” LY
minus-squareUnspecificGravity@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·3 months agoThese were probably redacted by a hundred people each doing their own dumb method.
minus-squareTrilogy3452@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoSo least amount of unredacted combination of the three is the closer one to what they said they’re trying to redact. The automation could’ve been employed partially through too, meaning some were left out early/late
Sounds plausible but if you search for
But there’s other very strange redactions as well, like “I” here
It’s probably some shitty AI work
I’d ONLY - I “DON” LY
These were probably redacted by a hundred people each doing their own dumb method.
Probably “I’d”
So least amount of unredacted combination of the three is the closer one to what they said they’re trying to redact. The automation could’ve been employed partially through too, meaning some were left out early/late