• Caitycat [she/her]@hexbear.netEnglish
    36·
    3 months ago

    Pretty disturbing that people on the left are trying to genuinely paint this as “Epstein supported transgender people” when what he’s saying here is literally just transgender fetishization. There is no genuine support here beyond “aren’t girls with dicks hot?”

  • Богданова@lemmygrad.ml
    27·
    3 months ago

    That email is literally fetishizing and objectifying trans women while talking about trans men as if they’re some sort of… idk what to say even, and this is considered “Pushing radical gender ideology”

    Holy shit, what a terrible day to be alive. JFC.

    This is, word for word, exactly the kind of shit Heinrich Himmler would be typing in his emails and there’s people on the “left” who think this makes Epstein, the eugenicist, woke? Whatever that “left” is, that’s beyond saving. I don’t have words to describe what I want to say.

  • Dort_Owl [they/them, any]@hexbear.netEnglish
    15·
    3 months ago

    How is this tranaphobic rant “pushing radical gender ideology”? Like literally there is a whole section of this email dedicated to “eww trans men are gross!”

    Transphobes are really desperate to make trans people the bad guys, aren’t they?

  • big_spoon@lemmygrad.ml
    9·
    3 months ago

    epstein was woke

    umm…your post paints a different idea:

    -the text was written by robert trivers, not epstein

    -it presents a weird idea of trans women being “superior” to trans men, and ideas of creating “dickgirls/futanaris” or smth because “girls with dicks are cute”, “some men would like to suck penis, but they don’t want to feel gay, so let’s put that penis in a cute feminine body!” and “trans girl make good money prostituting themselves!”

    idk, it sounds like a fetishist essay you’d read in 4chan by a wanker addicted to futanaris

    there’s nothing woke about this crap

    • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
      11·
      3 months ago

      It’s dated 2018 so unless somebody forged the impression of it being an email exchange from then, it would not be that kind of AI. It’s basically the right telling on themselves though, if real. That when they levy accusations of trans stuff being abusive / hurting kids in some way, they’re really talking about what a eugenicist trafficker would do who is on their own dehumanizing side of ideology, not the humanizing gender affirming care that the left pushes for.

      It’s a bizarro upside-down-world attempt to validate their slander about trans rights activism by pointing at someone who obviously isn’t one. It’s sort of like if I pointed out that Hitler owned a dog and said this is proof that dog owners are evil.