FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前I don't think I'll continue using Arch, btwlemmy.ohaa.xyzimagemessage-square114linkfedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down152
arrow-up1320arrow-down1imageI don't think I'll continue using Arch, btwlemmy.ohaa.xyzFQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square114linkfedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Pacman is very fast. The tradeoff is that it isn’t as “thoughtful” when it runs. It doesn’t have the same protections as apt or dnf. I especially like dnf as you can undo any operation.
Why would Arch do this?
Pacman is very fast. The tradeoff is that it isn’t as “thoughtful” when it runs. It doesn’t have the same protections as apt or dnf. I especially like dnf as you can undo any operation.