silence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1612arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up1609arrow-down1external-linkChemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’www.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.net to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-text
In practice, this means 3M is continuing to create harm from the risks they spent decades covering up
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months agoNo they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
minus-squareP1nkman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 months agoWrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
minus-squareMaeve@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 months agoReverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.
No they can’t. Do you know where fancy spring water brands get their water? The fucking tap, that’s where.
Wrong. The rich uses lab-grown water, clean from all the chemicals!
Reverse osmosis, which wastes a lot.