Can someone explain this to me?

  • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I found this source with some info. Quoting a relevant bit:

    Most studies that considered sidewalk-riding suggested that it is particularly hazardous for cyclists, with estimates of 1.8 to 16 times the risk of cycling on-road [29,66-68,71]. However one study found that the risk of traveling on the sidewalk was the same or lower than riding on residential streets [64]. Another considered the direction of travel and found that the elevated risk when sidewalk cyclists entered intersections was almost exclusively related to cycling against the flow of adjacent on-road traffic

    It can seem counter-intuitive that riding where the cars are is safer, but if you think about it, it makes sense. Cars don’t expect fast-moving vehicles on the sidewalk (they often barely expect pedestrians…), the constant curbs impacts your flow while riding, people more often ride against traffic on the sidewalk than on the road, and honestly people riding on sidewalks probably tend towards more inexperienced than people who feel comfortable riding on the road.

    • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      people more often ride against traffic on the sidewalk than on the road

      There may also be a case of taking the sidewalknis done on my risky roads, that is difficult to control for.

      In my case I ride one section against the road on the sidewalk because the alternative is to cross a road of 80kph+ traffic twice in 600m with a toddler. In the other direction we ride on the road because we don’t have to cross it, and the traffic is usually only doing 10 kph.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s situational surely, and I think an experienced cyclist knows when to take the sidewalk. But an experience cyclist also needs to know that sidewalks ARE NOT SAFE, they are just a less unsafe alternative when road conditions become intolerably unsafe, and they need to use even more caution than they normally do on the road when they take that option.

        • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I agree, I’m just curious if you see more sidewalk riding because the roads are so unsafe, thus making the adjacent sidewalks unsafe, thus making sidewalks appear more unsafe than they really are.

          It’s not an easy factor to tease out of the data; and frankly it’s a discussion that should be avoided because it pits cyclists and pedestrians into discussion about the sliver of space left over when tons is already given to motorists.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank you for sharing; great points.

      To me, this sounds a bit like crosswalks/intersections are the unsafe part rather than sidewalks.

      It’s a rule of thumb for cyclists to walk their bikes across intersections (even on bike paths/trails!), turning cyclists into pedestrians. Not that pedestrians are particularly safe where I live, but that would address part of the issue here.

      Sidewalks where I live tend to have boulevards (grass off to either side for cyclists to pull onto), which may be different than the environments where these studies took place (I’m picturing buildings on one side and roads on the other).