While no isrealis specifically, I know a handful of dual citizens that have either served their conscription requirements to meet citizenship requirements, or joined the Canadian forces to get their national conscription checked off in lieu.
I also know one person who volunteered with the Ukrainian foreign legion. Their biggest hurdle was the days in Canada requirements surrounding healthcare access.
I'm also going to guess it wasn't $20 million in one freezer.
$200 in spoilage for a pharmacy delivery is a pretty low percentage that's about 4-10 flu vaccines. There's somewhere around 10,000+ pharmacies in Canada. Sounds like acceptable spillage.
Now, if its 20 failures at $1m each, then someone should be deep diving the fuck put of each failure.
Inaction is an action. Copy pasting another design without thought is an action. Not applying engeering judgement as an engineer is why civil engineers in Canada wear an iron ring to this day.
If someone died at an intersection, then it is insufficiently engineered. If someone was seriously injured at an intersection, then it is insufficiently engineered.
Collisions, no matter how frequent, should lead to no more than minor injuries.
Generally speaking, reducing public servants increases consultancy requirements, not reduces.
If you don't have someone with the capabilites/skills/corporate knowledge/experince/capacity to do X thing on the payroll, then you need to hire a consultant to do it.
Now obviously I couldn't tell you what ministry/department/etc needs, but let's take the Alto contract as an isolated example.
We don't have any rail expertise in government at all, so we need to consult it in, and we pay a premium for that. In the lens of a single rail project, that makes a a lot of sense, we aren't paying payroll and maintaining expertise for a once in a generation project.
The alternative is having something like a national rail crown corp or department, like SNCF in France. Now all the experience is at the national level whenever you need it. SNCF has a lot more staff, planning, and engineering capacity than it requires; so that gets farmed out to regions and municipalities to help them with their rail/metro/tram projects. This is instead of each of them needing consultants, driving up the costs for municipal governments/capital projects.
In this manner increased federal spending becomes an accelerant for other levels of government and reduces regional and municipal spending, and thus the overall tax burden for everyone.
So if we had something like SNCF then the Alto project might cost a little more, but the Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Ottawa, Toronto, and Montréal recent/ongoing lines would be cheaper; plus medium cities like Victoria, Winnipeg, Québec City, and Halifax would have rail projects in their reach; and smaller cities like Red Deer, Regina, Thunder Bay, Kingston, Trois Rivières, and Fredericton would have tram projects in their reach.
I'm having a hard time taking you as an honest person.
I appreciate the attempt.
At one point, the CDC designated corrective lenses as a comorbidity because they were so desperate to make people think it only impacts disabled people
So this is the source of my misinformation. I've been told, and had no reason until now, to believe that certain vulnerable groups have worse outcomes, and therefore need extra protection. It makes sense to me to give these people extra protection (which a targetted vaccine scheme seems to do).
Nobody cares about what is equitable "to you,"
Individual me, no; multiple, yes. The pol in politics stands for people, public health is a political system. If public health Québec isn't doing enough on COVID, than the people must demand action.
The funding was obviously hyperbolic, but PH does have to work in a resource constrained environment.
people are too morally flawed to stay home and because of the original sin we can't mitigate death from COVID
Never said that. We can't stay home because "the economy"
you've shown that you are an apathetic and dangerous person who feels no responsibility for what they say.
Im sorry you think that. I like to believe I think mostly rationally with the information presented to me. That doesn't mean i have the best information, or right circumstances, to make an optimal choice.
And if a cop sees a PEV hey think is going too fast, it seems they can pull it over and test it. If a cop sees a car they think is going too fast, we'll they should have had the radar gun out, too bad.
Land border with Denmark already exists.