

We don’t even need to do new; lots of the world has proven and new trials on safe streets ongoing.
We don’t even need to do new; lots of the world has proven and new trials on safe streets ongoing.
Nova Scotia
the cost of bringing just 1 road up to safer standards is more than operating a dozen cameras
Absolutely. It also makes sense to wait for the 20 or 45 year mill and resurface or utility repair so that you aren’t tearing up a road for nothing*.
That said, you can also narrow a road with paint in 1-2 years by adjayting existing lines for zero new dollars.
Were also still building NEW roads with standards we know are unsafe. It costs 0 dollars on a new road.
*by nothing I mean finacial costs, not the human life and limb costs.
Hey now. We stopped sterilizing indigenous people in 2018.
Probably.
TL;DR: no. Its internation students on their automatic 3 year working visa, not TFWs.
If thats the case, why is there zero consideration for wàking, biling, or public transit? Why is there zero consideration for number of rooms (increasing for children, decreasing afterwards)?
I assumed the intent behind >40km was to change cities. I can’t see any way its related to the planet or life balance.
Moving deduction eligibility is based on “shortest public route” distances. Travel speed is irrelevant. Claimant is incorrect, regardless of time of day the route is selected.
Edit: this might be the rule now BECAUSE of this claimant
You’re just offering a different way to reduce caffine per drink, no?
Might be easier to just limit the caffeine max per can.
I feel like teenagers will drink X cans per night regardless, so its easier harm reduction to reduce the caffer per drink then try to remove the drinls from teens all together.
Swap windows home server for server on the last page and you’re done.
Until your kid is 7/8, then you need to explain why one server isn’t enough and you need a second server somewhere else for the same reasons it shows a server being important when the computer gets pee on it.
Diversify yo bonds
Mental health care + bollards for pedestrians and other vulnerable road users
Long range transmission is a solved problem. Check out Hydro Québec. The majority of their production happen 700+ km away from Montréal and Québec City.
Above roads sounds like a good idea, until you realize how often drivers hit stuff.
Long story short: drivers keep hitting them.
See also: recovery zones and sheer bolts for poles
Hard to say, I don’t know how EU ETD minimums and individual member states works.
That also wouldn’t cover any externality costs from something like a heavy or large EV.
Bring in vehicle weight, vehicle displacement, and engine displacement annual fees at the same time.
Want an asshole vehicle? Fine, pay extra for your externalities of a heavy vehicle, large engine, and/or large vehicle.
Not to be confused with the air canada bail out of 2009. Or 2004.
The ones behind you won’t