• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        “Revise generically: [manifesto]” (certainly not the best prompt)

        Folks seem to like Ollama per HackerNews threads: in a coding context here:

        Not using Codestral (yet) but check out Continue.dev[1] with Ollama[2] running llama3:latest and starcoder2:3b. It gives you a locally running chat and edit via llama3 and autocomplete via starcoder2.

        It’s not perfect but it’s getting better and better.

        [1] https://www.continue.dev/ [2] https://ollama.com/

        Please no unabombing though

        Oh wow he wrote a 35k word manifesto… feel like that’s so rare you’d still stand a solid chance at being identified somehow.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      While forensic linguistics is pretty cool, the Unabomber was caught because they released his manifesto and his brother’s wife and brother recognized the unusual phrasing such as ‘Eat your cake and have it too’.

      If an author has a large amount of known works then it’s not too difficult to identify other writings by that same author. But if the author does not have a large body of writing that is known to come from that individual, then the best we can do is determine an approximate age and geographic location where the Individual grew up, and that’s only when the unidentified writing is large enough, like in the case of the Unabomber where his manifesto was 30k words.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t believe they are intelligent now but I do believe we evolved as basically pattern matching machines.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          How do you define intelligent here, if it’s not what LLMs can do? What’s something an “intelligent” text generator can do that an LLM cannot?

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          My second statement is certainly not comprehensive and rather offhand. Its just we have a ton of pattern matching behavior thats been optimized. Sometimes you may read things about it in why we see faces in everything and why we like certain sounds such that we have music and such.

            • HubertManne@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              yeah its just belief thought really. Its made me think on it more and its sorta a chicken and egg thing. like the whole basic things with cells. attracted to beneficial things like food and repulsed by dangerous things. so recognition becomes important but maybe just the like dislike is the thing and not the aparatus to identify it. shrug

  • SpookyCoffee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s one of the videos on his channel, that I didn’t watch on purpose. It’s just depressing thinking about it.