License (as always): CC-0, No rights reserved.

Hello m@tes. I have immigrated from lemm.ee following the imminent closure, (and needed to but ana in front of my name because the one I used on lemm.ee was taken.)

Here is just a small thing I made after skimming the comments of a recent popular post. As it is a small image and I’m getting better with Krita this one only took ~35 minutes. Improvements. Yay!

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Fine, replace it with “reducing harm”. Y’all very well understand what I mean by the term in this context, and if you don’t, I’d be happy to clarify.

    If that’s all that article has to say (which it doesn’t) then it’d simply be clearing up some semantic confusion.

    • NSRXN
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      voting Harris didn’t reduce any harm, but it did prevent real alternatives from gaining traction.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        How does anti-electoralism prevent alternatives from gaining traction? Nobody in this thread has yet advocated for voting 3rd party, if that’s what you’re implying.

        • NSRXN
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          How does anti-electoralism prevent alternatives from gaining traction?

          I didn’t say it does. you are arguing with a strawman

          • enkers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s a question, signifying I have no clue what your actual position is. If you don’t care to elucidate, I’ve got no argument for a non-position.