enkers

I know she’ll be fine, but I’d also prefer that future career politicians go study at places that still have a shred of integrity left.

I have a hard time considering something that has an immutable state as sentient, but since there’s no real definition of sentience, that’s a personal decision.

Technical challenges aside, there’s no explicit reason that LLMs can’t do self-reinforcement of their own models.

I think animal brains are also “fairly” deterministic, but their behaviour is also dependent on the presence of various neurotransmitters, so there’s a temporal/contextual element to it, so situationally our emotions can affect our thoughts which LLMs don’t really have either.

I guess it’d be possible to forward feed an “emotional state” as part of the LLM’s context to emulate that sort of animal brain behaviour.

Not them, but static in this context means it doesn’t have the ability to update its own model on the fly. If you want a model to learn something new, it has to be retrained.

By contrast, an animal brain is dynamic because it reinforces neural pathways that get used more.

Uncountably infinite, even.

Unless you’re in comp sci, and AI is a field, not a marketing term. And in that case everyone already knows that’s not “it”.

They’re really hoping this to be the final solution.

Yes, post pics of shoe on head.

Part of me thinks its all the same person since they all link stuff like this and kinda talk similarly, but I suppose if that were the case, the instance mods would probably have logs. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I prefer 20, but sometimes I’ll read on my phone in bed as 10, then accidentally fall asleep.

This one here, right?

Endorsement of or justifications for Hamas or Hezbollah, or slogans or graphics positively referring to these organizations. These are considered terrorist organizations in Germany.

I don’t think expressing understanding is either endorsement or justification. So as written, it should be fine, but since it comes down to the mods interpretation, who knows what the outcome would actually be.

That’s… not what anyone is suggesting. They just want streaming services to also have to contribute a % of their revenue to CanCon, just like traditional broadcasters do.

Every tenth episode you have to watch Letterkenny.

But honestly, it says in the article:

Earlier Friday, Canadian media company Corus urged the CRTC to require traditional broadcasters and online players to pay the same amount into the Canadian content system. The broadcaster, which owns Global TV, said both should contribute 20 per cent of their revenue toward Canadian content.

Currently, large English-language broadcasters must contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming, and the CRTC last year ordered streaming services to pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to a fund devoted to producing Canadian content.

The foreign streaming services are fighting that rule in court and Netflix, Paramount and Apple pulled out of the CRTC hearing earlier this week.

There is a minor downside: If anyone carelessly moves said bread bag, it can come untwisted, untucked, or both.

But yeah, I’m on team twist and tuck. (Although, since I live with other people, I normally just continue the method currently in place.)

This honestly doesn’t make much sense. The implication would be that all citizens are culpable for their government’s actions once they start paying taxes.

Funding your government isn’t a voluntary act, so your last parenthetical already invalidates most of what you said.

If this were any other account, I’d get your drift… But you? It’s for cheese, isn’t it? :|

Lol!

Nonono… just do us a favour and don’t film it. I’ve been scarred enough for a lifetime.

Hairbrush. It’d fit fine, but it’s got rubberized paint that’s coming off the handle. :/

Yeah, that’s pretty pedantic. xD

Text emoji is kaomoji, which is the Eastern branch of emoticons, so you’re right, technically it wouldn’t generally include o7, but that’s kinda splitting hairs.

You’re also right, o7 has more broad uses than F, but they do both get used in a usually tongue-in-cheek “condolences” manner. So you can almost always use o7 in the place of F, but not necessarily the other way around.