• Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    It’s surprising this was faster and cheaper than simply building a small block of single level apartments (eg. Duplex style).

    The effort to build those block/brick foundations…

    Thanks for the link!

    • zabadoh@ani.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Think about what things would have been like after the earthquake: Any building materials and labor would have been in extremely high demand.

      The faster that one could put up anything to house people, the better, even using “waste materials” like old streetcars.

      At least these had a solid roof and walls.

      No doubt there was even more temporary housing that would resemble homeless huts that we see today.

      Sadly, according to the article, these didn’t stay for very long, and were replaced by more traditional construction after 4 years.

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        26 days ago

        I mean, I’m more surprised they bothered with the foundation at all really. It’s not like they couldn’t have slapped it on the ground with some wheel chocks and called it a day. In fact, I know of people in the 21st century doing that with old W-class trams here in Victoria.